Can a national benefactor really be like this?

It is hard to believe, but according to the published materials it becomes clear that

1. The former heads of ENA took out loans in order to pay ENA’s tax obligations and salaries.
2. ENA’s financial resources were provided free of charge to individuals and legal persons connected with the Company’s former heads.
3. All information on the actual electricity consumption of the public and legal entities for the years 2018–2024 was deleted from ENA’s database.
4. A number of individuals and companies received loans amounting to several hundred million drams, for which ENA became the guarantor.
5. Purchases at ENA were made at 1.5-2 times higher than their actual cost.
6. Over the past two years, the tariffs for new connections have been inflated 10 times.

Is this what a national benefactor is supposed to be like? These are very serious accusations which not only must be addressed in court, but which also require a very clear and very swift response from the “Mer Dzevov” (“In Our Way”) movement that has made a political bid.

Our country has not so demoralised that a political force can continue its carefree activity while facing such accusations.